Margaret Court vs Chris Evert: Who Is the Greater Tennis Women's Player?
Margaret Court's staggering 24 Grand Slam singles titles, an all-time record, established her as a dominant force across both the amateur and Open eras, where her 64 total Grand Slam titles showcased an unparalleled all-around game. Standing 5'9", her powerful serve-and-volley style made the Australian Open her personal playground, securing an astonishing 11 singles titles there. Yet, squaring off against her is Chris Evert, the epitome of baseline consistency, whose poker-faced precision and revolutionary two-handed backhand delivered a near-unthinkable 90% career winning percentage. Evert's 18 Grand Slam singles titles, including a record seven French Open crowns and six US Opens, were often forged in the crucible of her defining 80-match rivalry with Martina Navratilova. This clash pitches Court's record-breaking volume and multi-surface mastery against Evert's era-defining consistency and iconic rivalries.
Head-to-Head Scores
| Criterion | Margaret Court | Chris Evert | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statistics | 10.0(99) | 6.4(93) | Court |
| Peak Performance | 9.4(97) | 6.8(93) | Court |
| Longevity | 6.6(89) | 7.4(91) | Evert |
| Cultural Impact | 2.2(78) | 5.7(87) | Evert |
| Strength of Competition | 3.0(82) | 4.5(85) | Evert |
Normalized scores (1-10) with raw scores (0-100) in parentheses. Bold = advantage.
Career Highlights Compared
Margaret Court
- ★24 Grand Slam singles titles (all-time record)
- ★Completed Career Grand Slam
- ★64 Grand Slam titles across all events
- ★Won Australian Open 11 times
- ★Only woman to win mixed double Grand Slam
Chris Evert
- ★18 Grand Slam singles titles
- ★260 weeks as World No. 1
- ★90% career winning percentage
- ★7 French Open titles (record)
- ★6 US Open titles
Head-to-Head Analysis
Margaret Court's statistical dominance is undeniable, holding the all-time record of 24 Grand Slam singles titles and an astounding 64 total major titles across all events. Her three Career Grand Slams underscore a versatility rarely seen, highlighted by her unique achievement of winning a mixed doubles Grand Slam. Court's 1970 Calendar Grand Slam epitomizes her peak, and her 11 Australian Open titles may stand as the sport's most unbreakable record. However, Chris Evert carved out her own legend with a relentless consistency reflected in her 90% career winning percentage and 260 weeks as World No. 1. Evert's 18 Grand Slam singles titles include a record 7 French Open titles, demonstrating her mastery on clay, complemented by 6 US Open titles. The defining narrative of Evert's career was her epic 80-match rivalry with Martina Navratilova, which saw them split almost evenly, showcasing her ability to consistently compete at the absolute highest level against a peer. While Court dominated an earlier era, Evert's prolonged excellence over 17 years, securing at least one Slam for 13 consecutive years, and her iconic rivalry speak to a sustained high-level performance against top competition. Court's sheer volume of titles, especially her 64 major titles, stands as a testament to her all-around game, but Evert's consistent excellence and defining rivalry against one of the game's greats offer a compelling counter-argument.
The Case for Margaret Court
Statistics
24 Grand Slam singles (all-time record), 64 total Slam titles — unmatched volume
Peak Performance
Calendar Grand Slam 1970, 11 Australian Open titles
Longevity
17 years (1960-77) spanning amateur and Open eras, took breaks for children
Cultural Impact
Record holder but controversial views have complicated legacy significantly
Strength of Competition
Dominated amateur era with less depth; Open Era wins add credibility
The Case for Chris Evert
Statistics
18 Grand Slams, 260 weeks #1, 90% career winning percentage
Peak Performance
7 French Open titles, 6 US Opens, at least 1 Slam 13 consecutive years
Longevity
17 years (1972-89). Consistent excellence over nearly two decades
Cultural Impact
America's Sweetheart, popularized women's tennis with mainstream audience
Strength of Competition
Navratilova rivalry defined era with 80 matches, but less depth beyond top rival
How Different Philosophies Change the Winner
The GOAT debate depends on what you value. Here is how Margaret Court and Chris Evert compare under different ranking philosophies:
| Philosophy | Description | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default (Rage-Bait) | Impact & peak weighted heavily | Chris Evert | 6.15 - 5.94 |
| Slam Collector | Grand Slam titles define the legacy | Margaret Court | 7.46 - 6.35 |
| Consistency Queen | Sustained excellence over a long career | Chris Evert | 6.30 - 6.18 |
The Verdict
Choosing between Margaret Court and Chris Evert ultimately hinges on what one prioritizes in a tennis GOAT. Fans who value sheer, overwhelming statistical volume and multi-surface dominance across singles, doubles, and mixed doubles will likely lean towards Court, whose 24 Grand Slam singles titles and 64 total major titles remain unmatched. Her 11 Australian Open titles further solidify her case for statistical supremacy. Conversely, admirers of relentless consistency, era-defining rivalries, and an iconic playing style might favor Evert. Her 90% career winning percentage, 260 weeks at World No. 1, and the enduring saga of her 80 matches against Martina Navratilova speak to sustained excellence against formidable opposition. The GOAT Equation invites users to weigh these elements themselves, revealing whether ultimate numbers or defining consistency sways their decision.
Books, Documentaries & Gear
Affiliate links may earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Disagree? Make Your Own Rankings
Adjust the weight sliders to prioritize what matters most to you and see how Margaret Court and Chris Evert stack up.
Create Your Tennis Women's Rankings